ORDER

The appellants before us in this appeal, have called in question the validity and correctness of the order dated 13.1.2000 passed by the High Court in CWP No.6654/99. The appellants in the first instance approached the Central Administration Tribunal by filing O.A. No. 3099/91 and O.A. No.1014/93. The Tribunal dismissed both the O.As. Not satisfied with and aggrieved by the said orders of the Tribunal they approached the High Court by filing the writ petition afore-mentioned. The High Court did not find any good reason or valid ground to take a different view than the one taken by the Tribunal in that view the writ petition was dismissed, affirming the orders passed by the Tribunal.

2. The appellants claimed that they were employees of Northern Railways and were working as supervisors in the Handicraft Centres; they were selected and appointed as supervisors by the railway authorities; they have been working as railway employees and as such they were entitled for the reliefs sought for in the original applications before the Tribunal. In O.A. 3099/91 the appellant No.1 herein, namely, Phool Badan Tiwari was aggrieved by the notice dated 17.12.1991 by which the Presi