R.C.LAHOTI, ARUN KUMAR
T. Lakshmipathi – Appellant
Versus
P. Nithyananda Reddy – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.C. Lahoti, J.-A decree for eviction passed in favour of the respondent No. 1 on the grounds available under Section 10(2)(i) and 10(3)(b)(iii) of A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction) Control Act, 1960 by the courts below and upheld by the High Court is under challenge in this appeal by special leave, filed by the persons in occupation of the premises. The facts of the case are complex and litigations between the parties are multiple. It will be useful to notice in brief the several litigations between the parties which will have an incidental bearing on the principal controversy and would enable precise appreciation of the facts.
2. The suit premises are non-residential bearing Door No. 18-7-4 situated in Ponniamman Koli Street of Chittoor town. This property was initially owned by one P. Nayarana Reddy. In the year 1959 a suit was instituted for partition of certain joint family properties wherein the suit property was one of the items. P. Narayana Reddy had two sons, namely, P. Nithyananda Reddy, the respondent No.1 and P. Manohar Reddy and five daughters. Late P. Narayana Reddy, his wife and his two sons were arrayed as plaintiffs. Partition of joint family propertie
Shaikh Faqir Baksh v. Murli Dhar & Ors.
Corporation of the City of Victoria v. Bishop of Vancouver Island
Rahim Bux & Ors. v. Mohammad Shafi
Hind Rubber Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Tavebhai Mohammedbhai Bagasarwalla & Ors.
Nalakath Sainuddin v. Koorikadan Sulaiman
D.G. Gouse & Co. (Agents) Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Kerala & Anr.
Badri Narain Jha & Ors. v. Rameshwar Dayal Singh & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.