SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 542

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, BRIJESH KUMAR
Hira Lal Hari Lal Bhagwati – Appellant
Versus
C. B. I. New Delhi – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

What is the effect of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 on criminal proceedings under the Indian Penal Code and the Customs Act when a settlement is reached? What are the conditions under which a prosecution for offences under Chapter IX or XVII IPC can be barred or quashed in light of KVSS-98 certificates and declarations? How does the Court treat immunity granted under KVSS-98 in relation to concurrent criminal proceedings and civil settlements for offences such as cheating or evasion of customs duty?

Key Points: - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!) - (!)

What is the effect of the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 on criminal proceedings under the Indian Penal Code and the Customs Act when a settlement is reached?

What are the conditions under which a prosecution for offences under Chapter IX or XVII IPC can be barred or quashed in light of KVSS-98 certificates and declarations?

How does the Court treat immunity granted under KVSS-98 in relation to concurrent criminal proceedings and civil settlements for offences such as cheating or evasion of customs duty?


Judgment

Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.—Leave granted.

2. These two appeals arise out of the final judgment and order passed by the High Court Delhi at New Delhi in Criminal Miscellaneous (M) Nos. 360/2002 and 447/2002 filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the appellants herein seeking the invocation of the inherent powers of the High Court for quashing the F.I.Rs and the proceedings initiated in pursuance thereto, as also the process issued by the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi. The learned single Judge of the Delhi High Court, by the impugned final orders, held against the appellants that obtaining from the Ministry of Health Customs Duty Exemption Certificate, that was meant for actual user on false assertion makes out the offence under Section 120B read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The respondent herein (Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi) initiated criminal proceedings under Section 120B read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code against the appellants on the ground that the appellants in conspiracy with the Director of Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Mr. T.B. Patel (decea







































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top