RUMA PAL, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
Rai Vimal Krishna – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ruma Pal, J.-This case relates to the assessment of the appellants holdings in Patna under the Patna Municipal Corporation Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).
2. A brief survey of the relevant provisions of the Act is necessary before considering the facts of the case since the appellants grievances are that the provisions of the Act have not been followed in assessing the appellants properties to tax.
3. The Act, which came into force on 15th August 1952, was passed to consolidate and amend the law relating to the municipal affairs of the town and suburbs of Patna. Section 123 of the Act allows the Corporation, with the previous approval of the State Government, to impose various taxes and fees. We are concerned with clauses (a), (b) and (c) of section 123 which provide for the imposition of property tax, water tax and latrine tax on holdings situated within Patna - the tax being assessed on the annual letting value. Section 130 provides that the annual value of a holding shall be deemed to be the gross annual rental at which the holding may reasonably be expected to let. This however is subject to rules that may be prescribed by the State Government. Any tax
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.