SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 348

S.N.VARIAVA, H.K.SEMA
Bharat Heavy Electricals LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Indore – Respondent


ORDER

These appeals are against the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal dated 23rd February, 1999.

2. Briefly stated the facts are:-

The appellants are manufacturers of heavy electrical equipment and machinery which they make as per the specific requirements of customers. The Terms and Conditions of sale to the customer contains a warranty clause which provides for free replacement of defective parts within a period of 12 months to 18 months. At the time of sale the appellants charge 2.5%, of the factory cost, as a "complaint reserve". This element is added to the price. It is not disputed that the excise duty is paid on the total amount charged to the customer including this element of 2.5% complaint reserve. At a subsequent stage, on some occasions, parts have to be replaced by the appellants during the warranty period. The question for consideration is whether excise duty is payable on the parts which are replaced during the warranty period. Both the Collector and the Tribunal have held that excise duty was payable. Hence these appeals.

3. It has been submitted that the part has to be replaced free of cost during the warranty period. It is submitted




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top