SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 410

2003(4) Supreme 496
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri & Ashok Bhan, JJ.
Metal Box India Ltd. -Appellant
versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai -Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 2547 of 1997
Decided on 3-4-2003

IMPORTANT POINT
Payment of pre-deposit covered under Section 35F of Central Excise Act does not fall under any categories of Section 22 of Sick Industries Act.

Headnote:Central Excise Act, 1944-Section 35F-Appeal dismissed by Tribunal on ground that amount required to be deposited was not deposited-Appeal-Contention that in view of Section 22 of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, appellant was not bound to deposit amount-Payment of pre-deposit covered under Section 35F of the Act would not fall under any category of Section 22 of Sick Industries Act-No illegality in impugned order. (Para 3)

       

ORDER

This appeal is filed against the Order No. 152/97-WZB passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, West Regional Bench at Mumbai (for short the Tribunal ), in Appeal No. E-789-RV/95-Bom., dated December 23, 1996.

2. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the ground that the amount which was required to be deposited under Section 35F of the Central Excise Tax Act, 1944 was not deposited within the period allowed by the Tribunal.

3. Mr. Rana Mukherjee, the learned Counsel for the appellants, submits that in view of Section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 (for short the Sick Industries Act ), the appellant need not deposit the amount, as ordered by the Tribunal, as protection is available to the appellant under the said provision. We are afraid, we cannot accept the contention of the learned Counsel for reasons more than one. First, this aspect was not the subject matter of the order under challenge and, secondly, Section 22 of the Sick Industries Act, provides relief in regard to the proceedings which relate to (a) winding up of the industrial company; (b) execution, distress or the like against any of the properties of the industrial company, (c) the appointment of a receiver in respect thereof, and (d) proceeding in regard to suit for recovery of money or for the enforcement of any security against the industrial company or of any guarantee in respect of any loans or advance granted to the industrial company. Payment of pre-deposit covered under Section 35F of the Central Excise Tax Act, 1944 does not fall under any of the above-mentioned categories in Section 22 of the Sick Industries Act.

4. We find no merit in the appeal. It is, accordingly, dismissed but, in the circumstances of the case, without any order as to costs.

Appeal dismissed.

***************

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top