SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 595

M.B.SHAH, ARUN KUMAR
Om Prakas Bhatia – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Customs, Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Shah, J.-Questions requiring consideration in this appeal are :-

(A) Whether over-invoicing of the goods for export would mean attempt to export prohibited goods ? and

(B) Whether, while exporting the goods, exporter has to give value of the goods as provided under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) or the value of goods which he expects to receive on sale of goods in the overseas market?

2. The facts in brief are:-

It is stated that the appellant is engaged in the export of garments. Appellant received an order from an overseas buyer i.e. from Dubai, for supply of ladies skirts, the contracted price for which was said to be approximately $10.25 per piece. Appellant filed 4 shipping bills in 1998 for export of 28000 pieces of ladies skirts @ $10.25 per piece (Rs. 434 per piece) amounting to Rs.1,21,54,447/-. On checking, the actual quantity of the skirts was found to be 21184 pieces. On enquiry, the market price of the skirts was ascertained to be Rs.45/- per piece, according to which total value of the goods comes to Rs.9,53,280/-. The exporters had claimed a draw back of Rs.21,87,800/- on the con

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top