SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 673

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
Sankar Ram & Co. – Appellant
Versus
Kasi Naicker – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Shivaraj V. Patil, J.-"Whether protection provided in the proviso to Section 55 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 is available to a bona fide transferee for valuable consideration after the presentation of any insolvency petition but before the date of passing of the order for adjudication without notice of the presentation of the insolvency petition by or against the debtor", is the short question that arises for consideration and decision in this appeal.

2. The appellant filed petition under Section 55 of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 (for short the Act ) for recovery of Rs. 25,155.40 with interest from the Bank (respondent No. 2) on the ground that it had paid the said amount on 24.8.1978 for purchase of shares belonging to the insolvent Kasi Naicker (respondent No. 1). Said Kasi Naicker had filed a petition to declare him as insolvent in I.P. No. 7/76 in 1976, which was dismissed on 25.10.1977 by the Subordinate Court, Tuticorin. He filed appeal in C.M.A. No. 116/77 before the District Court challenging the order of dismissal, which was allowed on 17.10.1978. The appellant purchased 249 shares of Rajapalayam Mills belonging to the debtor Kasi Naicker by depos


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top