SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 817

DORAISWAMY RAJU, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Kaliyaperumal – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.- The appellants who were found guilty of offences punishable under Section 304B and Section 498A of the India Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC ) by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam, unsuccessfully challenged the conviction before the Madras High Court. By the impugned judgment the High Court only reduced the sentence from nine years to seven years for the offence punishable under Section 304B IPC but confirmed the sentence five years as imposed in respect of offences punishable under Section 498A, on the allegation that Devasena (hereinafter referred to as the deceased ) committed suicide because of the cruelty and tortures perpetuated by the appellants who were her father-in-law and mother-in-law respectively along with husband Ashok Kumar (since acquitted).

2. Synoptical resumption of factual position is as follows:

The marriage between the deceased and Ashok Kumar was solemnized on 27-1-1989. At the time of the marriage, it was a condition stipulated by the accused persons that along with other articles, 15 sovereigns of jewels and a cash of Rs. 10,000/- was to be paid. Though the parents of the deceased (PWs 3 and 4) agreed to meet the demand









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top