SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 579

DORAISWAMY RAJU, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Bihar State Housing Board – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.-Leave granted.

2. The basic issues involved in this appeal revolve round the question whether the award made under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) is barred by limitation.

3. Factual position in a nutshell is as follows:

A Notification under Section 4 of the Act was issued and published in District Gazette on 16-3-1989 and was subsequently published in two daily newspapers on 29-4-1989 and local publication was made on 20-3-1989. Publication of the declaration under Section 6 of the Act was made on different dates in the following manner: (a) in the District Gazette on 1-2-1990, (b) daily newspapers on 27-2-1990 and (c) local publication on 15-3-1991. The award under Section 11A of the Act was made on 25-3-1992.

4. A Writ application was filed by the landowner (respondent No. 5 herein) before the Patna High Court taking the stand that the award was made after the expiry of two years period as reckoned from the date of publication of the declaration on 27-2-1990 when it was published in two local daily newspapers. Referring to Section 11A of the Act the plea was accepted. This Court s judgment is Kaliyappan
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top