SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 579

2003(6) Supreme 410
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Patna High Court)
Doraiswamy Raju & Arijit Pasayat, JJ.
Bihar State Housing Board -Appellant
versus
State of Bihar & Ors. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 7011 of 2003
(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 877 of 2002)
Decided on 5-9-2003
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Himanshu Shekhar, Advocate.
For the Respondents : Ms. J.S. Wad, Ms. Niharika Bahl, Ms. Ram Bore, Advocate for J.S. Wad & Co. Advocates.
For the State of Bihar : B.B. Singh and Kumar Rajesh, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
Expression "date of publication of declaration" appearing in Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act a stage subsequent to Section 6, answering stipulation "hereinafter" has to be the last of dates out of the three modes of publication ordained by the statute.

Headnote:Land Acquisition Act, 1894-Section 11-A-Award made on 25-3-1992 set aside by High Court holding that award was made after expiry of two years as reckoned from date of publication of declaration on 27-2-1990 in two local daily newspapers-Appeal-Expression date of publication of declaration appearing in section 11-A has to be the last of dates out of the three modes of publication ordained by statute-Publication of declaration under Section 6 of the Act was made in District Gazette on 1-2-1990 and in daily newspaper on 27-2-1990 and in local publication on 15-3-1991-Award made on 25-3-1992 was not beyond prescribed period of limitation-Impugned judgment was liable to be set aside.

       Held : The crucial words in Section 11A are "within a period of two years from the date of publication of the declaration". Section 6(2) deals with the various modes of publication, as enjoined by the legislature and what is envisaged by the Statute is a conjoint publication, by all such methods. Various modes as prescribed in the provision itself are (a) publication in the official gazette, (b) publication in two daily newspapers circulating in the locality in which the land is situate of which at least one shall be in the regional language and (c) public notice of substance of such declaration at convenient places in the locality. There is no option left with any one to give up or waive any one or other of the modes and all such modes have to be strictly resorted to. Sub-section (2) of Section 6 therefore necessarily makes it abundantly clear that the last of the dates of the publication and giving of such public notice shall "hereinafter" be referred to as the date of publication of the declaration. Therefore, the expression "date of publication of declaration" appearing in Section 11A a stage subsequent to Section 6, answering the stipulation `hereinafter has to be the last of the dates out of the three modes of publication ordained by the Statute. In substance the triumvirate modes are cumulative and inseparable in the sense that unless all the three modes are resorted to and completed, there is no scope for the limitation period of two years beginning to run or for the penal consequences envisaged ensuing therefrom. (Para 7)

       

JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.-Leave granted.

2. The basic issues involved in this appeal revolve round the question whether the award made under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ) is barred by limitation.

3. Factual position in a nutshell is as follows:

A Notification under Section 4 of the Act was issued and published in District Gazette on 16-3-1989 and was subsequently published in two daily newspapers on 29-4-1989 and local publication was made on 20-3-1989. Publication of the declaration under Section 6 of the Act was made on different dates in the following manner: (a) in the District Gazette on 1-2-1990, (b) daily newspapers on 27-2-1990 and (c) local publication on 15-3-1991. The award under Section 11A of the Act was made on 25-3-1992.

4. A Writ application was filed by the landowner (respondent No. 5 herein) before the Patna High Court taking the stand that the award was made after the expiry of two years period as reckoned from the date of publication of the declaration on 27-2-1990 when it was published in two local daily newspapers. Referring to Section 11A of the Act the plea was accepted. This Court s judgment is Kaliyappan v. State of Kerala and Ors. (AIR 1989 SC 239) was referred to for upholding the stand of the landowner. Challenge before the Division Bench did not yield any result to the present appellant, for whose benefit the land was acquired. An application for review was filed which was dismissed by the impugned judgment by taking the view that there was no scope for review of the judgment and what was attempted to be done in essence amounted to appeal in the guise of a review petition.

5. Learned counsel for the appellant-Board submitted that the approach of the High Court is erroneous. The period has to be reckoned from the last date out of the series of publication envisaged and in view of the clear language of Section 11A, there was no scope for holding that the award was made beyond the prescribed time. Learned counsel for the State of Bihar supported the stand. But learned counsel for the respondent No.5 landowner submitted that the date of local publication is really of no consequence after the publication in the two local newspapers. Since a grievance was made by some of the landowners whose lands were simultaneously acquired that they had not been given due notice, the land acquisition authorities made a local publication of the substance of the declaration. This was an act done for the convenience of the parties and it cannot extend the period of limitation as prescribed under Section 11A of the Act.

6. In order of appreciate the rival contentions few provisions of the Act need to be noted. They are:

Sections 4(1), 6(1) and (2) and 11A read as follows:

"4. Publication of preliminary notification and powers of officers thereupon- (1) Whenever it appears to the appropriate government that land in any locality is needed or is likely to be needed for any public purpose or for a company, a notification to that effect shall be published in the Official Gazette and in two daily newspapers circulating in that locality of which at least one shall be in the regional language and the Collector shall cause public notice of the substance of such notification to be given at convenient places in the said locality (the last of the dates of such publication and the giving of such public notice, being hereinafter referred to as the date of the publication of the notification).

* * *

6. Declaration that land is required for a public purpose.-(1) Subject to the provisions of Part VII of this Act, when the appropriate government is satisfied, after considering the report, if any, made under Section 5-A, sub-section (2), that any particular land is needed for a public purpose, or for a company, a declaration shall be made to that effect under the signature of a Secretary to such government or of some officer duly authorized to certify its orders, and different declarations ma


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top