BRIJESH KUMAR, ARUN KUMAR
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Lal Krishna Advani – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Brijesh Kumar, J.-In this appeal, preferred by the State of Bihar, ultimately the question which falls for consideration is the effect of non-compliance of all time tested and ancient principle of natural justice. One cannot be condemned unheard is one of the attributes of the principles of natural justice, which operates even in absence of a written provision under the law. Though in the case in hand there is such a provision which, according to the appellant, was not necessary to be complied with, but the High Court of Patna has held to the contrary. It relates to applicability of Section 8B of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 (60 of 1952) (for short the Act ).
2. In the year 1989 some communal riots took place in Bhagalpur District, State of Bihar, resulting in many deaths and left some others injured. Undoubtedly, it was a matter of concern and the State Government decided to constitute a Commission of Inquiry under Section 3 of the Act, which reads as under:
3. Appointment of Commission.-(1) The appropriate Government, may, if it is of opinion that it is necessary so to do, and shall, if a resolution in this behalf is passed by [each House of Parliament or, as the
Shri Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Shri Justice S.R. Tendolkar & Ors.
The State of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors. v. Bakshi Gulam Mohammad & Anr.
Smt. Kiran Bedi and Jinder Singh v. Committee of Inquiry & Anr.
Brijnandan Sinha v. Jyoti Narain
Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay v. Dilipkumar Raghavendranath Nadkarni & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.