SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1027

N.S.HEGDE, B.P.SINGH
State Of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Ghudan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Santosh Hegde, J.-State of Madhya Pradesh is in appeal before us against a judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur in Crl. A. No.825 of 1988 whereby the High Court allowed the appeal of the respondent herein and set aside the conviction and sentence imposed on him by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal under Section 302, 380 and 457 of the IPC in ST No.90 of 1986.

2. Brief facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal are as follows:

According to the prosecution, Arun Kumar Mehta (PW-26) was a Typist working with a Member of Legislative Assembly who was residing in Quarter No.116/17, Shivaji Nagar, Bhopal and at that relevant point of time the said MLA was not in town and this PW-26 was occupying the garage attached to the house of the said MLA. On 13.2.1985 at about 10 p.m. PW-26 noticed some flashing of the light inside the unoccupied house of the MLA and apprehending that there was something wrong, he went to the house of Narayan Dubey (the deceased) who was living just behind the house of the MLA. At the request of PW-26, the said Narayan Dubey came out of the house with a sword in his hand along with him came a little later Dubey s son (PW-11) when t













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top