SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1113

SHIVARAJ V.PATIL, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
Bibi Zubaida Khatoon, Amichand Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
Nabi Hassan Saheb – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dharmadhikari, J.-These appeals are directed against a common judgement dated 28.7.1997 passed by High Court of Patna in two revisions under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure [hereinafter referred to as the Code ].

2. In the cross suits, one filed for redemption of mortgage and the other filed for specific performance of Agreement of Sale, the petitioner made two applications, for her impleadment as co-plaintiff in one suit and defendant in the other. Third application was filed for amendment of the pleadings consequent to her proposed joinder as a party in the two suits. The three applications were made respectively under Order 1 Rule 10, Order 22 Rule 10 and Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code.

3. According to the petitioner during pendency of the suits, she has purchased the suit property in the year 1996 from the original plaintiff - Amichand Agarwal and has, thus, acquired in his place the right of redemption of the mortgaged suit property. In the cross suit of the opposite party seeking specific performance of the Agreement of Sale based on the same acquisition of title during pendency of suit, joinder was sought to that suit as defendant.

4. The trial court by order














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top