SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 928

B.N.AGARWAL, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
Kamma Otukunta Ram Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Chereddy Pedda Subba Reddy – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B.N. Agrawal, J.-Fourteen accused persons including respondent Nos. 1 to 5 (hereinafter referred to as the respondents ) were tried for various offences and the trial court convicted the respondents under Section 302/149 of the Penal Code and each one of them was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. They were further convicted under Section 148 of the Penal Code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years. Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 4 were also convicted under Section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act and each one of them was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years. All the sentences, however, were ordered to run concurrently. So far as the other accused persons are concerned, they were acquitted of all the charges by the trial court itself. Against their convictions, the respondents filed appeals before the Andhra Pradesh High Court whereas son of the victim-Otukunta Appaiah filed a revision against the order of acquittal. The High Court dismissed the revision application but allowed the appeal, set aside the convictions and sentences awarded against the respondents by the trial court and acquitted them of all the charge

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top