SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1161

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, G.P.MATHUR, S.RAJENDRA BABU
High Court Employees Welfare Association, Calcutta – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


ORDER

The present writ petition seeks to challenge the refusal by the Governor of West Bengal to grant approval to the draft Calcutta High Court Services Rules, 1998 under Article 229(2) of the Constitution.

2. The brief facts are as follows:-

In 1995, the Government of West Bengal appointed the 4th Pay Commission the Terms of Reference of which included the employees of the Calcutta High Court. The High Court employees made a representation to the Chief Justice requesting exercise of this power under Article 229. Accordingly, a Three-Judge Committee was appointed. In the meanwhile, the Government of West Bengal contacted the Registrar of High Court for information about the employees for the purposes of Pay Commission. The Registrar replied by saying that a Committee has already been set up for this purpose. The Three Judge Committee submitted its report but expressed doubts about the enforceability of their recommendations in light of clause (2) of Article 229.

3. Pursuant to a resolution of the Full Court, a Five-Judge Committee was set up. The draft Rules proposed by this Committee was approved by the Chief Justice and was forwarded for approval of the Governor.

4. The State Governm

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top