R.C.LAHOTI, ASHOK BHAN
Amrendra Pratap Singh – Appellant
Versus
Tej Bahadur Prajapati – Respondent
JUDGMENT
R.C. Lahoti, J.-The suit property consists of a piece of agricultural land situated in Sundergarh area of Mouza Durgapur, Rourkela. Prior to the year 1962, the property belonged to Chand Oram and Pera Oram. Both of them belong to oraon tribe, which is a scheduled tribe in the State of Orissa as notified vide the Constitution Schedule Tribe Order, 1950 issued in exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 342 of the Constitution of India. On 21.12.1962 Chand and Pera transferred their right and interest in 0.75 decimals of land in favour of one Mangal Singh Manki. The said Mangal Singh Manki was also a person belonging to a scheduled tribe. Mangal Singh Manki, after obtaining the permission of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Pamposh, sold 0.40 decimals of land by a registered deed of sale dated 7.4.1964 executed in favour of one Ratnamani Mohapatra, and on the same day by another registered deed of sale transferred the remaining 0.35 decimals of land to one Harihar Pradhan. On 6.9.1975 Dr. Amarendra Pratap Singh, the plaintiff-appellant purchased 0.195 decimals of land out of 0.40 decimals from Ratnamani Mohapatra. It is this land purchased by the plaintiff-responde
Pandey Orson v. Ram Chander Sahu & Ors.
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Babu Lal & Ors.
Jagdish v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Madhavrao Waman Saundalgekar & Ors. v. Raghunath Venkatesh Deshpande & Ors.
Sanjay Dinkar Asarkar v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
None of the cases listed explicitly indicate that they have been overruled, reversed, or explicitly treated as bad law based solely on the provided information. The list predominantly references the case of Amrendra Pratap Singh v. Tej Bahadur Prajapati (AIR 2004 SC 3782 or (2004) 10 SCC 65), which appears repeatedly as a foundational or cited decision. There are no clear phrases such as "overruled," "reversed," "criticized," or "abrogated" in any of the entries, nor any indication that a subsequent case has explicitly disapproved or invalidated the case.
Numerous references indicate that the decision in Amrendra Pratap Singh (AIR 2004 SC 3782 / (2004) 10 SCC 65) has been followed or relied upon in subsequent judgments. Phrases such as "the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Amrendra Singh vs." and "the ratio of the decision in case of Amarendra Pratap Singh (AIR 2004 SC 3782)" suggest that this case remains authoritative and is being applied as precedent. Examples include:
Entries citing "relying upon the decision in Amrendra Pratap Singh v. Tej Bahadur Prajapati" (e.g., entries 01400006933, 01700046459, 02200019302).
References to the case as the basis for legal principles, such as adverse possession, transfer of immovable property, and tribal land rights.
Multiple mentions of the case being used as a guiding authority in later judgments.
There are no explicit indications in the provided list that any case has been distinguished or set apart from Amrendra Pratap Singh or other cases. The list does not contain language such as "distinguished," "differentiated," or "not applicable" to any particular case.
No entries suggest that the case has been criticized or questioned. Phrases like "criticized" or "questioned" are absent, and there are no references indicating judicial disapproval.
Some cases mention reliance or application of the principles laid down in Amrendra Pratap Singh without further elaboration on treatment. For example:
Entries 01300039729 and 01300039663 mention reliance on the case but do not specify whether the case was followed, distinguished, or questioned.
The treatment of the case in some entries appears to be neutral or merely citing it as authority, leaving ambiguity about whether it is still considered good law or has been implicitly questioned or limited.
The repeated references to the case's principles, especially regarding adverse possession and tribal land rights, without mention of subsequent disapproval, suggest treatment is generally consistent with continued validity, but without explicit confirmation.
**Source :** State Of W. B. VS Kesoram Industries LTD. - Supreme Court Harishchandra Hegde VS State of Karnataka - Supreme Court State Of W. B. VS KESORAM INDUSTRIES LTD. - Supreme Court Lincai Gamango VS Dayanidhi Jena - Supreme Court Abdul Gani Ansari VS Addl. District Magistrate - Orissa Tikam Singh VS State - Rajasthan Badri Lal Raigar VS State of Raj. - Rajasthan Avinash Kumar Chauhan VS Vijay Krishna Mishra - Supreme Court Raju Saha VS On the death of Sambhunath his Legal heirs, Smt. S. Dev Nath - Gauhati Dharmeshkumar Chandulal Purohit VS Ghanshyamdas Bachomal Rangwani - Gujarat Ganpat VS Hemraj - Madhya Pradesh Executive Officer, Sri Bramaramba Mallikarjuna Swamy Temple VS Sai Krupa Homes - Andhra Pradesh David Edison @ Adison Lima VS Addl. Dist. Magistrate - Orissa H. T. Bevuare Gowda VS Venkatesh - Karnataka D. H. Krishnasa VS Special Deputy Commissioner - Karnataka Radheshyam VS Jwakim - Chhattisgarh VA Friendship Solar Park Pvt. Ltd. VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan VA Friendship Solar Park Pvt. Ltd. VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan Banwari Lal VS Anand - Rajasthan U. P. GANDHI SMARAK NIDHI VS AZIZ MIAN - Allahabad STATE OF U. P. VS Ist ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LUCKNOW - Allahabad BABU VS KHUDIAL QAYUM - Allahabad RAMA SHANKAR VS OM PRAKASH LIKHDHARI - Allahabad Om Veer Singh Chauhan VS learned Presiding Officer, learned Rent Tribunal Udaiur - Rajasthan Prembai VS Khurshid Bano - Rajasthan Banda Pulla Reddy VS Banda Lakshmamma - Andhra Pradesh Jogendra Panda VS Collector, Kalahandi - Orissa PANGU ALIAS APPUTTY (DEAD)THROUGH L. Rs. VS NARAYANI - Supreme Court SHAMBHOO VS DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CONSOLIDATION, FAIZABAD - Allahabad Steel Authority of India Limited VS Union of India - Jharkhand Anita Devi VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand Rajasthan Housing Board VS New Pink City Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd - Supreme Court Laxmi Patari (Datta) VS Bibha Datta - Tripura Ravindra Tiwari VS State of Madhya Pradesh - Madhya Pradesh SANDEEP BHATNAGAR VS STATE OF U. P. - Allahabad Amritlakshmi Machine Works VS Commissioner of Customs (Import) - Bombay BANSH RAJ VS RAJ PAT - Allahabad BALA BAKSH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES VS MAGAN LAL (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES - Rajasthan G. Narayan Reddy VS P. Narayana Reddy - Andhra Pradesh Shakuntala Mishra VS Jagadeep Pratap Deo - Orissa K. J. ABRAHAM VS MARIAMMA ITTY - Kerala Saraswati Dei @ Jena VS Gopinath Jew at Adhanga, Jagatsinghpur - Orissa Harekrishna Mahanta VS A. D. M. , Sundergarh - Orissa Bhagabatia Panda VS Collector, Jharsuguda - Orissa Meenugu Mallaiah VS Ananthula Rajaiah - Andhra Pradesh Harful Agrawal VS Tribikram Behera (since dead), his L. Rs-Tamal Behera - Orissa Bhurua Padhan (dead) after him his L. Rs. Smt. Gouri Barik VS Shelu Sahar @ Bisal - Orissa Badri Ram S/o Shri Fata Ram VS Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer - Rajasthan Poddu Amanatya VS Dhansai Harijan - Orissa BALARAM DAMBA VS BHAGABAN NAIK - Orissa Kishin S. Loungani VS Union of India - Kerala Pareshnatha Sahoo VS Mst. Parbati Bariha - Orissa Abdul Aziz VS Member Board of Revenue, Orissa, Cuttack - Orissa BHIKHARI VS D. D. C. , JAUNPUR - Allahabad Sumer Arora VS Manoj Kumar - Delhi Nakkaraju Satyavathi VS Mulagada Venkata Ramana Kumari - Andhra Pradesh Prabir Debnath VS Mati Debnath - Tripura Latooree VS Shyam Lal (since deceased and represented by LRs. ) - Allahabad Dharavath Vijaya Laxmi VS Territory Coordinator Retail Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. - Telangana Gaya Prasad VS Nathu Singh - Allahabad Hasvantbhai Chhanubhai Dalal VS Adesinh Mansinh Raval - Gujarat Satyan VS Deputy Commissioner - Supreme Court Tvl. Super Recording Co. Ltd. , Rep. by its Managing Director VS Commercial Tax Officer - Madras P. Kamala, D/o Late K. Puttiah VS State Of Karnataka Revenue Department - Karnataka Competition Commission of India VS Grasim Industries Ltd. - Delhi Vishwanath Singh VS Munni Bai Kewat - Madhya Pradesh Krishan Kumar Singhal VS Punjab Sindh Kshetra - Uttarakhand VINODCHANDRA SAKARLAL KAPADIA VS STATE OF GUJARAT - Supreme Court Kavita VS Deputy Commissioner - Karnataka Sharda Devi VS Lokendra Kumar - Madhya Pradesh Ramswarup VS State of M. P. - Madhya Pradesh Vinit Agarwal alias Vineet Agarwal VS Union of India - Jharkhand Foti Rakabchand Jain VS Foti Ratanlal Jain - Madhya Pradesh Mangal Sai Armo S/o Late Sukrit Ram VS Union of India Through Secretary, Ministry of Coal, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi - Chhattisgarh Calcutta Landing & Shipping Co. Limited (Presently Known As CLS Limited) VS Manbasa Devi, Since Deceased And Duly Substituted By Mr. Kumar Omprakash - Calcutta Manish Singh Malukani S/o Shri Parasram Singh Malukani VS Hari Prasad Gupta S/o Late Chotelal Gupta - Madhya Pradesh Dinesh Kumar Prajapat VS Vinod Pankaj - Rajasthan Shah Newaz Khan VS State of Nagaland - Supreme Court Ghamand Singh VS Inder Singh - Uttarakhand Anil Kumar Sinha, son of Late Sharda Prasad Sinha VS Damodar Valley Corporation - Jharkhand Pingili Pullaiah S/o Buchaiah VS State of Telangana - Telangana Sudheendra Rao Kasabe Since Deceased By Lrs VS Narasayya S/O Hampayya Since Deceased By Lrs - Karnataka Bihar State Electricity Board, through its Secretary VS Jharkhand State Electricity Board through its Secretary - Jharkhand Pawan Kumar Alias Pawan Yadav VS State of U. P. , Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Govt. Civil Sectt. Lko - Allahabad Shashank Pandey VS State Of U. P. Thru. The Addl. Civil Secy. Home U. P. Lucknow - Allahabad A2z Waste Management (Meerut) Pvt. Ltd Thru. Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Yuvraj Sharma VS Construction And Design Services, U. P. Jal Nigam, Noida Thru. Director/Project Manager - Allahabad Sumit Kumar Alias Sumit Kumar Gupta VS State Of Uttar Pradesh Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. - Allahabad Ashokbhai Madhubhai Patel VS Madhubhai Jagubhai Patel - Gujarat Ashok Kumar Singh VS State Of Uttar Pradesh - Allahabad Ashokbhai Ramcharan Shrivastava VS Dhaniben Mohammedbhai Chauhan - Gujarat Smadh Sarbhanji VS Range Forest Officer, Seonsar - Punjab and Haryana In Re: The Waqf Amendment Act, 2025 (1) VS . - Supreme Court State Of M. P. VS Babu Lal - Supreme Court Gamini Krishnayya VS Guraza Seshachalam - Supreme Court Sanjay Dinkar Asarkar VS State Of Maharashtra - Supreme Court Pandey Oraon VS Ram Chander Sahu - Supreme Court MADHAVRAO WAMAN SAUNDAL GEKAR VS RAGHUNATH VENKATESH DESH PANDE - Supreme Court Manchegowda VS State of Karnataka - Supreme Court JAGDISH S/o RAMCHARAN VS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH - Madhya Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.