SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1223

ARIJIT PASAYAT, DORAISWAMY RAJU
State Of Orissa – Appellant
Versus
Kanduri Sahoo – Respondent


ORDER

The State of Orissa questions correctness of judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Orissa High Court by which the respondent was acquitted of the charges under Section 20 (b)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 (for short the Act ). Though the trial court found the respondent-accused guilty of offences, the High Court held that the accusation was not established and, therefore, directed acquittal.

2. The factual position is as under:

On 13.5.1994 at about 7.00 A.M. the Excise Sub-Inspector, Mobile Squad No. 1, Cuttack (PW-1) while patrolling with his Assistant Sub-Inspector and constables at Gandhi Palli area in Cuttack City noticed the accused with a full gunny bag. Being suspicious that the accused was carrying contraband articles, he searched the accused in presence of witnesses. He found that the gunny bag contained cannabis (ganja) weighing about 12 kg. 50 grams were taken as sample and was sent for chemical examination. The chemical examination report indicated that the sample was cannabis (ganja). On completion of investigation, the accused was sent up for trial which ended in conviction and sentence of 5 years R.I. and fine of Rs. 5000/- wi










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top