S.RAJENDRA BABU, RUMA PAL
Challamane Huchha Gowda – Appellant
Versus
M. R. Tirumala – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rajendra Babu, J.-Leave Granted.
2. In execution of a decree the executing Court brought the properties owned by the Petitioner-Judgment Debtor for sale. Proclamation was published on 19/07/1992. On 26/08/1992 the scheduled properties were put up for auction. The final bid was offered by respondent No. 1 in Court on 28/08/1992. On 25.9.1992 the Petitioner-Judgment Debtor paid the entire decretal amount together with the cost to the Respondent No. 2 - Decree Holder accompanied by memorandum of objections for confirmation of sale. A memo was also filed praying to close the execution proceedings. On 30/10/1992 another Memo was filed in the Executing Court reporting the payment of the decree amount. Then the executing Court directed the Petitioner - Judgment Debtor to pay solatium to the Respondent No. 1 - Auction Purchaser. Executing Court also noted that the Respondent No 1 - Auction Purchaser was not ready to accept the solatium amount. In the meanwhile, on 13/11/1992 Respondent No. 1 - Auction Purchaser filed an Interlocutory Application under Order 21, Rule 92 of CPC for confirmation of sale. On 24.07.1993 the Petitioner - Judgment Debtor filed an application to treat the e
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.