SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1123

ARIJIT PASAYAT, B.P.SINGH, DORAISWAMY RAJU, N.S.HEGDE
Rajendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.-Appellants faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 8 read with Section 20 (B)(1) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short the Act ). Each was found guilty and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/- with default stipulation by the learned Special Judge (NDPS) Bhopal. The conviction and sentence were maintained by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur by the impugned judgment.

2. Background facts as projected by the prosecution during trial are as follows:

On 31.3.2001, while Inspector Ajay Singh Bisen (PW-10) was on duty at G.R.P Police Station, Bhopal, he received an information that two persons had got down from Madhya Pradesh Express and were waiting at platform No. 2 for Coolie with suitcases and bags in which they were carrying contraband article (Ganja). This information was recorded by him (Ex.P-25) and thereafter, he proceeded with his staff to the place as per the information received by him. He found the appellants standing with the suitcases and bags. On search of the suitcase of appellant No. 1 Rajendra, he found 23 kilograms of "Ganja" t






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top