SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1270

2003(8) Supreme 813
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Gujarat High Court)
S. Rajendra Babu & G.P. Mathur, JJ.
GSF Medical & Paramedical Association -Petitioner
versus
Association of Management of Self Financing Technical Institutes & Anr. -Respondents
Special Leave Petition (C) No. 18297 of 2003
With
(SLP (C) No. 17845/2003, SLP (C) No. 18298/2003, Conmt. Pet. (C) No. 323/2003, Conmt. Pet. (C) No. 343/2003
With
SLP (C) No. 19182/2003)
Decided on 15-12-2003
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appearing Parties : C.A. Sundram, R.F. Nariman, R.P. Bhatt, C.S. Vaidyanathan, P.P. Rao, Harish N. Salve, Ranjit Kumar, Sr. Advocates, P.H. Parekh, Lalit Chauhan, Mrs. Hemantika Wahi, V.B. Joshi, Ravi Kini, Krishan Kumar, Sumit Gupta, Vikas Shoni, Avinash Kumar, A.P. Mayee, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
Admissions to professional and non professional colleges can be made by the management upto 50% of the students.

Headnote:EDUCATION-Admissions to professional and non-professional colleges-Manner of-Self finance institutes-Admission even in quota of management should be strictly on basis of merit-Order of Government fixing the mode in which fee structure has to be regulated or admissions are to be made, challenged-Admissions can be made by the Management upto 50%-Matter pending before different High Courts-Petitions disposed of accordingly.

       Held : In the working of directions regarding the admissions to professional or other colleges as fall out in the TMA Pai Foundation s case (supra), clarifications were sought from the Court in Islamic Academy of Education s case (supra). By the time Islamic Academy of Education s case (supra) decided certain directions had been issued by the Government pursuant to which 20% seats have already been filed up by the Government. If these seats have already been filled up pursuant to the Government order dated 9th May, 2003 it would not be appropriate to disturb their admissions if such students are otherwise qualified as per the standard prescribed by the Medical Council for India in medical colleges or any other such or similar body prescribing standard for admission in respect of other institutions. No entrance examination has been held in the State of Gujarat and students are being admitted on the basis of the marks obtained in the 12th standard examination and of course subject to the standard prescribed by the relevant medical or technical education council or some other similar body and particularly in view of the fact that this Court has allowed the Management to fill up the seats upto 50% of the seats. It must be stated that the admissions can be made by the Management upto 50% but it will of course include the 20% seats which they have already admitted, that means, their quota left out will be only 30%. If nominations have been made either by the Management or by the Joint Admission Committee before 30th September, 2003 the same shall be treated as having complied with the directions issued by this Court in MCI v. Madhu Singh case to which reference has already been made and admissions shall be completed on that basis. No fresh admissions shall be made until the disposal of the proceedings before the High Court. These petitions shall stand disposed of on the basis of these directions. (Para 6)

       

ORDER

In TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka, 2002 (8) SCC 481, this Court indicated the manner in which admissions to professional and non-professional colleges could be regulated depending upon whether they are aided or non-aided institutions or whether they are the minority or non-minority institutions and several guidelines were set out therein. Medical Council for India sent a letter on 11th February, 2003 drawing attention of the Educational Institutions, Medical Colleges and Universities as well as Government of India to the decision in Civil Appeal No. 5166 of 2001 [MCI v. Madhu Singh & Ors.] as to the necessity of commencement of the academic session on 1st August of each year and admissions should be completed by 30th September of the concerned year and no admission shall be made by the admitting agency beyond 30th September of the concerned year. The Government of Gujarat formed a Joint Admission Committee on 3rd May, 2003. The Government of Gujarat permitted the management of respective colleges to fill up 80% of the seats as indicated in clause (3) in respect of self-finance institutes by stating that in private self-finance medical, dental or physiotherapy institutes 80% of sanctioned seats will be filled up by the Central Admission Committee, as per merit-cum-preference basis on the basis of consensus arrived among the self-finance institutes. The management of self finance institutes will admit the students on the remaining seats on transparent basis, on merit, as per the scheme to be declared in advance in line with the judgment of this Court as per the consensus of self-finance institutes. It is stated that the managements admitted certain students on the basis of this resolution. There is, however, dispute as to whether they fulfill the condition of merit as per the scheme but we need not examine that aspect at this stage of the proceedings, if such students otherwise fulfil the requirements of Medical Council in case of Medical Colleges and similar body in case of other colleges. Thereafter the Government passed a resolution prescribing fee structure on 28.5.2003. Several petitions were filed before this Court challenging the action of the Government and this Court by a decision in Islamic Academy of Education & Anr. v. State of Karnataka & Ors., 2003 (6) SCC 697, apart from giving certain directions in relation to the fee structure also indicated the manner in which the students can be admitted in the colleges. It emphasises that the admission even in the quota of management should be strictly on the basis of merit. However, in State of Gujarat no separate entrance test is conducted by the Government or by the Association of self-financed colleges. The merit considered by the State Government on the marks at the examination of 12th standard for the year 2003-2004. Therefore, the self financed institutes also adopted this procedure.

2. The order of the Government fixing the mode in which fee structure has to be regulated or admissions are to be made was called in question before the Court. A learned single judge made an interim order apart from giving directions regarding the fee structure gave further directions in regard to the admissions of the students.

3. The matter was carried in appeal on the letters patent side and a civil application was filed and the Division Bench by an interim order stayed the orders of the Government dated 6th May, 2003 and 1st July, 2003 subject to certain conditions. So far as the admission is concerned, the interim directions given by the learned Single Judge stood affirmed subject to the following two conditions:

"(a) The concerned institute/college shall forward the applications for admission received by it directly from the students on management quota to the Joint Admission Commission for Professional Courses by tomorrow.

(b) The applications which may be forwarded by the management Committee, as indicated above, shall be considered by





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top