SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 1321

DORAISWAMY RAJU, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Chanakya Dhibar (Dead) – Appellant
Versus
State Of W. B. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.-The informant has filed this appeal questioning judgment of acquittal rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court acquitting five respondents (hereinafter referred to as the accused by their respective names). Since he has died during the pendency of the appeal, an application for substitution by his legal representatives has been filed which is allowed.

2. The trial Court found the respondents guilty of offences punishable under Sections 148 and 304 Part I read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the IPC ). Law was set in motion by PW-1 (Chanakya) on the accusation that Jaba Dhibar (hereinafter referred to as the deceased ) was assaulted severely by five respondents on the date of occurrence i.e. on 16.9.1985 at about 9.45 p.m. Naran Dhibar (PW-3) who was accompanying him saw the assault by accused Mana Bhattacharjee and fearing assaults on him ran away and informed the family members of the deceased. On hearing about the assaults, the informant, his elder brother Naran and Sandhya, wife of the deceased (PW-2) went to the spot. When they arrived there finding the deceased with bleeding injuries, took him to the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top