SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 26

2004(1) Supreme 1047
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Allahabad High Court)
S.N. Variava and H.K. Sema, JJ.
Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Sahaswan District Badaun through its Secretary -Appellants
versus
Mohammed Ibrahim & Anr. -Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 7459 of 1997
With
Civil Appeal No. 7462 of 1997
With
Civil Appeal No. 7464 of 1997
With
Civil Appeal No. 7465 of 1997
Decided on 7-1-2004
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Mrs. Shobha Dikshit, Sr. Advocate, Pradeep Misra, Mrs. Indu Mishra, Advocates.
For the Respondents : Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Advocate, Abhineet Sinha, Ms. Minakshi Nag, R. Mathur, Ejaz Maqbool, S.P. Sharma, Ashwani Bhardwaj, Abhishek Atrey, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
Valuation fixed by District Magistrate in respect of lands in the area of acquired land cannot be taken a basis to determine market value of acquired land under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act.

Headnote:Land Acquisition Act, 1894-Section 23-Claimants relied upon order passed by Stamp Officer and valuation fixed by District Magistrate in respect of lands in the area of acquired land-Valuation could not be fixed on those basis-No evidence of any sale instances of comparable lands was led-Valuation fixed in other appeal for same land awarded to respondents also. (Para 1)

       

JUDGMENT

S.N. Variava, J.-In respect of acquisition by the same notification we have today passed a Judgment in Civil Appeal No. 7463 of 1997 wherein we have fixed market value at Rs. 24.64 per. sq. yard. In these cases the respondents have led no evidence of any sale instances of comparable lands. They have relied upon the order passed by the Stamp Officer in case of the respondent in Civil Appeal No. 7463 of 1997 and the valuation fixed by the District Magistrate, Badaun in respect of lands in this area. As has been set out in detail in the Judgment in Civil Appeal No. 7463 of 1997 valuation cannot be fixed on these basis. Though the respondents have led no evidence as the acquisition is under the same notification, to maintain uniformity, we award the same value as in Civil Appeal No. 7463 of 1997.

The Appeals stand disposed of accordingly. There will be no order as to cost.

Appeal disposed of.

******************

 

00028

00029

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top