SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 2

2004(1) Supreme 319
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
V.N. Khare, CJI., S.B. Sinha, J.
Ajay Gandhi & Anr. -Petitioners
versus
B. Singh & Ors. -Respondents
Transferred Case (C) No. 5 of 1997
With
T.C.No. 6 of 1997
Decided on 5-1-2004
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appearing Parties : Raju Ramachandran, Additional Solicitor General, S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate Buddy A. Ranganadhan, A.V. Rangam, J.B. Dadachanji, Rajiv Nanda, C.V.S. Rao, P. Parmeswaran, P.H. Parekh, V.B. Joshi, Rajiv K. Garg, Advocate for A.D.N. Rao, Advocate/Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
President, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has power of transfer and posting of the members of the Tribunal.

Headnote:Income Tax Act, 1961-Sections 252(1) to (3)-Income Tax Appellate Tribunal-Power of transfer and posting of members-Whether Central Government can be said to have any power to transfer and posting of members of the Tribunal-President has the requisite power of transfer and posting of its members-Central Government never exercised its purported power of transfer and posting in its capacity as an employer or otherwise-Power of transfer and posting is a part of administrative function of the President as an ancillary power of constitution of benches-However, the President cannot be said to have an unguided, unfettered and unlimited jurisdiction-Guidelines laid down by the Court.

       Held : The scheme of the Act plays an important role. In the instant case, having regard to the provisions contained in sub-sections (1) and (5) of Section 255 of the Act, we are of the opinion that the President has the requisite power of transfer and posting of its members. For construction of a statute, it is trite, the actual practice may be taken into consideration. (Para 15)

       Keeping in view the fact that the independence of the Tribunal is essential; for maintaining its independence any power which may be conferred upon the executive authority must be proved to be in the interest of imparting justice. We are of the view that this long standing practice should be allowed to prevail over the stand of the respondents herein. However, we are of the opinion that by reason thereof, the President cannot be said to have an unguided, unfettered and unlimited jurisdiction as the same may be flawed with great consequences. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the following guidelines could serve the said purpose:

        (i) Initial posting of a member shall be done by the Government in consultation with the President of ITAT.

        (ii) Postings to different benches shall be done by the President having regard ordinarily to the following:

        (a) A member save and except for sufficient and cogent reasons shall not be posted at a place where he had earlier been practising as an advocate or a Chartered Accountant, as the case may be.

        (b) A member may not be posted at a place where any of his parents, spouse or other close relation is practicing as an Advocate or a Chartered Accountant in taxation matters.

        (c) Save and except for sufficient and cogent reasons, the Member shall not posted at a place of a period exceeding five years. Ordinarily, a Member may not be posted at a place where he was earlier posted unless a period of two years has elapsed.

        (iii) The President shall keep the Government informed about the orders of posting. The Government, if it so thinks fit, shall have the liberty to bring to the notice of the President, ITAT relevant facts including that transfer and posting of a member is not in conformity with the aforementioned guidelines. It shall also be at liberty to bring to the notice of the President any case of extreme hardship which may be faced by a member by reason of such an order of transfer and posting.

        (iv) The Government shall have further liberty to request the President to transfer a member from a particular bench when it is in public interest or in an exceptional circumstances. The President, ITAT, it goes without saying, shall consider the same in proper perspective. If the President refuses to comply with the request of the Central Government, although the transfer is in public interest in such a cases it would be open to the Central Government to pass order of transfer. (Para 21)

       In view of the fact that the large number of members are functioning at different places and, thus, the advice of the senior Vice-Presidents as regard the functioning of a particular member including his efficiency, disposal and other relevant factors may be considered by the President in ultimately passing such orders of transfer and posting. (Para 22)

       

JUDGMENT

V.N. Khare, CJI.-The Income Tax Act was first introduced in the country in the year 1922. The said Act was repealed and replaced with the 1961 Act (hereinafter called and referred to for the sake of brevity the said Act). Section 5A of the 1922 Act was in pari materia with sub-sections (1) to (3) of Section 252 as it originally stood. The provision of appeals to the Appellate Tribunal as contained in Chapter XX thereof came into being in the year 1941. Section 252 of the Act mandates the Central Government to constitute an Appellate Tribunal consisting of as many judicial and accountant members as it thinks fit to exercise the powers and discharge the functions conferred on the Appellate Tribunal. The said provision lays down the qualification of a judicial member and an accountant member. The President of the Tribunal is to be appointed ordinarily from the judicial member of the Tribunal. The Central Government is also authorised to appoint one or more members of the Appellate Tribunal as Vice-President and in the event there are more than one Vice-Presidents, it may appoint a Senior Vice-President. The Senior Vice-President or a Vice-President may be delegated by the President such functions of the President as may be delegated to him by a general or special order in writing.

2. Several notifications have been issued whereby and whereunder the President, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal delegated the powers to Vice-presidents.

3. Sub-section (1) of Section 255 provides that powers and functions of the Appellate Tribunal may be exercised and discharged by Benches constituted by the President of the Appellate Tribunal from amongst the members thereof. Sub-section (5) of Section 255 reads thus :

"Subject to the provisions of this Act, the Appellate Tribunal shall have power to regulate its own procedure and the procedure of Benches thereof in all matters arising out of the exercise of its powers or of the discharge of its functions, including the places at which the Benches shall hold their sittings."

4. The Tribunal is functioning since 21.5.1941. From its very inception, the President of the Tribunal has been exercising the power of transfer of the judicial members and the accountant members to the places where different Benches are functioning. The second respondent herein, however, in purported exercise of its power under Rule 10 of the Delegation of Financial Powers Rules, 1958 read with the Ministry of Finance O.M. No. F. 10(13) B-Coord/79 dated 10.4.1975 and 8.3.1976 and in partial modification of the Department letter No. F.3(18)/75 Admn. III (LA) dated 26.6.1978 directed the President of India had been pleased to decide that President, I.T.A.T. shall thenceforth submit all proposals for postings and transfers of members including Senior Vice-President and Vice-Presidents of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to the Ministry for prior approval. It was further stated :

"The President, ITAT shall issue orders regarding posting and transfer of the members after approval of the Ministry indicating therein that they have been issued after approval of the competent authority. A copy of all such orders shall invariably be endorsed to the Ministry.

The President of India is further pleased to decide that the Ministry may also issue orders of posting and transfers of Members when considered necessary."

5. Questioning the validity of the said order, the Appellant herein has filed this writ petition claiming, inter alia, for the following reliefs :

"In this circumstances, the petitioners pray this Hon ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order declaring that the impugned order contained in letter No. F.No. A 60011(54)/96 -Admn. III (LA) dated 15.11.96, copy whereof is Ex. `A to the petition and the impugned order passed by the Hon ble President of India referred to therein is without jurisdiction and is liable to be treated as non-est for all purposes and pass such other order(s) as may be deemed fit an


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top