SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 30

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
Alakh Ram – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


ORDER

Leave granted.

2. The appellant Alakh Ram was tried by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jhansi for the offence punishable under Section 8 read with Section 20 of the NDPS Act. He was found guilty under Section 20 and was sentenced to undergo three years imprisonment. He filed an appeal before the High Court and by the impugned Judgment, the High Court declined to interfere with the conviction and sentence.

3. The case against the appellant was that he planted Ganja in his Aruee field and on 9.6.1992, the Station Officer Ravinder Kumar Mishra with Constable, P.S. Katera visited the agricultural field belonging to the appellant and seized 17 Ganja plants allegedly planted by the appellant. Two witnesses were also present at the time of the recovery of these plants. All the 17 plants were taken into custody and on chemical analysis, it was proved that these plants were Ganja plants. The appellant on being questioned under Section 313 Cr.P.C. stated that he had filed a criminal complaint against four persons and the SDM had passed order in his favour and that when he went to the police station to serve the order passed by the SDM, he was falsely implicated in the case.

4. We heard the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top