SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 234

BRIJESH KUMAR, ARUN KUMAR
Prahlad Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Brijesh Kumar, J.-Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court dismissing the writ petition preferred by the appellant challenging the order passed by the State of Uttar Pradesh purportedly in exercise of its revisional power under Rule 13 of U.P. Government Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the U.P. Rules of 1999 ) setting aside the order passed by the Chairman of the U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation (for short the Corporation ) and restoring the order passed by the Managing Director imposing penalty of dismissal against the appellant.

3. The Corporation is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act. It is a Government company. The appellant has been working as a Service Engineer in the said Corporation at Hapur. It is the case of the Corporation that the appellant had committed serious financial irregularities which came to the light of the Corporation and in respect thereof the Managing Director of the Corporation instituted a departmental enquiry some time in October, 1997. The charges were found proved and ultimately the Managing Director pa

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top