SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 632

G. P. MATHUR, S. RAJENDRA BABU
Muller And Phipps (India) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise, Bombay-i – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Rajendra Babu, CJI.-In these appeals arising out of an order passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal ) question raised for our consideration is whether Johnson s Prickly Heat Powder and Phipps Processed Talc are patent or proprietary medicines classifiable for the purposes of excise duty under the erstwhile tariff item 14E (as prior to 1.3.1986) and Heading 30.03 (subsequent to 1.3.1986) as claimed by the appellants or whether they are cosmetics or toilet preparations falling under the erstwhile tariff item 14F (prior to 1.3.1986) and Heading 33.04 (after 1.3.1986) as claimed by the Department.

2. The Tribunal held that the products in question are cosmetics and not medicament on the basis that boric acid, salicylic acid and zinc oxide present in the product are subsidiary pharmaceutical or antiseptic constituents and their curative and prophylactic value is subsidiary and, therefore, the product is a preparation for the care of the skin and is classifiable under tariff item 14F upto 28.2.1986 and under heading No. 33.04 from 1.3.1986 and there is no legal infirmity in the order issued under Section 37


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top