G.P.MATHUR, S.RAJENDRA BABU
In Re: News Item Published In Hindustan Times Titled "and Quit Flow Maily Yamuna" – Appellant
Versus
N. R. – Respondent
ORDER
Rajendra Babu, J.-On 11.12.2001, this Court made an order as follows :
"I.A. has been filed. It has been taken on board and the same be numbered.
Learned Amicus Curiae draws our attention to the notification dated 7th June, 2000, wherein it was inter alia stated that the plans would be sanctioned only after arrangements for provision of augmentation of municipal services have been made. He then contends that now a press note has been issued on 27th November, 2001 which purports to supercede the said notification and permits construction of additional floor without first augmenting the civic infrastructure. The press note indicates that it is only after money is generated by granting permission to construct additional floor that there will be augmentation of civic infrastructure. The learned Amicus Curiae submits that this is not only contrary to the notification of 7th June, 2000, but town planning also requires the civic infrastructure being in place before building is allowed to be constructed.
Issue notice to the M.C.D., N.D.M.C., Delhi Administration as well as the Union of India. Stay of implementation of the press note dated 27th November, 2001 in the meanwhile."
2. In I.A.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.