SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 679

RUMA PAL, S.H.KAPADIA
Gajraj Jain – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Kapadia, J.-Leave granted.

2. The question in this civil appeal by special leave is - whether Bihar State Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as "BICICO") acted mala fide and in breach of section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951 by transferring the assets of the debtor company on 19.3.2002 and executing the agreement dated 26.4.2002 with M/s. Stichworth Exports Pvt. Ltd. (respondent No. 4).

3. The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows :

In 1982, a company by the name M/s. Katihar Flour Mills (P) Ltd. was incorporated to take over the assets and business of a partnership firm M/s. Katihar Flour Mills, a business conducted by Jeloka group. The said company was promoted by Gopi Krishna Jeloka (since deceased), Binod Jeloka and Pradeep Jeloka (since deceased). The company is engaged in the business of manufacturing, processing, buying and selling of all kinds of grains and wheat products. The flour mill is the main asset of the company. It is located in Katihar, Bihar. On 16.5.1988, a term loan of Rs. 90 lacs was taken by the said company from BICICO, a State Financial Corporation within the meaning of the State Fi



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top