SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 909

B.N.SRIKRISHNA, SHIVARAJ V.PATIL
Sayed Muhammed Mashur Kunhi Koya Thangal – Appellant
Versus
Badagara Jumayath Palli Dharas Committee – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Shivaraj V. Patil, J.-The first respondent (plaintiff) filed the suit O.S.No. 91/84 for declaration of its title and for recovery possession of the plaint schedule property. The appellant (defendant No.2) filed written statement in the suit contending that the suit was not maintainable; the plaintiff had no title to the plaint schedule land; the agreement dated 13.2.1973 did not confer any title on the plaintiff and the said agreement was signed only by five members of the tarwad out of about 100 members and it did not convey legal or valid title over the properties in question on the plaintiff. In addition, the defendant No.2 resisted the suit on some more grounds. Trial court, after a full dressed trial, appreciating the evidence placed on record, decreed the suit declaring that the plaintiff-committee has got title to the property as mutawalli in management of the mosque and common graveyard. The trial Court also granted decree for recovery of possession of plaint schedule property from the defendant No.2 with a direction that the defendant No.2 should domolish the alterations made by him during the pendency of the suit and surrender possession of the premises with the s


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top