SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 896

S.N.VARIAVA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Commissioner Of Central Excise, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Modi Alkalies And Chemicals LTD. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.-The Custom, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short CEGAT ) by the common impugned judgment held that there was no inter-dependence so far as the respondent No. 1-company and respondent Nos. 2-4 companies are concerned.

2. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows :

Respondent No. 1- M/s Modi Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. (in short MACL ) is engaged in the manufacture of caustic soda of which Hydrogen gas is a by-product. The Central Excise Authorities noticed that in reality MACL was engaged in the manufacture of Hydrogen gas falling under sub-heading 2804.90 of the schedule of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1988 (in short Tariff Act ). But with a view to evade payment of excise duty it floated three front companies, namely, respondent Nos. 2 to 4 i.e. M/s Mahabaleshwar Gas & Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. (for short MGCPL ), Shri Chamundi Gas and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. (for short SCGCPL ) and M/s. Nippon Gas and Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. (for short NGCPL ). All the three front companies were in vicinity of the factory of MACL. What in reality happened was that through pipelines Hydrogen gas was sent to the three front companies for compressin













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top