SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 844

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
Dhain Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


ORDER

The appellants challenge the order of conviction and sentence passed against them by the Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala which was confirmed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana. The first appellant was convicted under Sections 304-B and 201 IPC and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years respectively. The second appellant was found guilty under Section 201 IPC and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years.

2. The incident happened on 13-10-1988. Shinder Kaur the daughter of PW-2 was married to the first appellant Dhian Singh about two and a half years prior to her death. After the marriage Shinder Kaur stayed with her husband for about one year. It was alleged that the first appellant, the husband, wanted more dowry and started harassing her so she left her matrimonial home and started staying with her parents. Then at the intervention of the local panchayatdars a settlement was effected and about two months prior to her death, she left her parents house and again started staying with the appellant Dhian Singh. On 22.10.1988, PW-2 came to know that his daughter Shinder Ka














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top