SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 966

ARIJIT PASAYAT, C.K.THAKKER
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Munna – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J.-Leave granted.

2. The Union of India calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court holding that respondent No.1 (hereinafter referred to as the accused ) was not guilty of the offence punishable under Section 20(b)(2) and Section 23 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short the NDPS Act ). The Trial Court i.e. the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Sidharthnagar had convicted the accused guilty for the aforesaid offences, and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for 15 years and pay a fine of rupees one lakh with default stipulation.

3. Accusations which led to the trial of the accused are essentially as follows:

On 17.10.1994 at about 6.30 p.m. Inspector of Customs Sri B.K. Srivastava, Incharge Customs Station Khunwa, District Siddharthnagar, received an information that a person carrying Charas from Nepal shall be passing through the Customs Barrier (Khunwa Check Post). Consequently, Sir B.K. Singh, complainant (PW-1) summoned two independent witnesses and took position near the Barrier. At about 7.00 p.m. a Jeep bearing No. UTD 5560 was seen coming from Nepal side and when it






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top