SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 383

B.N.SRIKRISHNA, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
Southern Ispat LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Srikrishna, J.-The judgment of the Division Bench of the Kerala High Court dismissing writ appeal No. 2614/2001 of the appellant is challenged before us in this appeal. The writ appeal itself was to impugn the judgment of the single Judge dismissing O.P.No. 9007/1999 by the appellant.

2. With a view to encouraging the industrial process in the State of Kerala, and as a measure of incentive, the State Government decided as a matter of policy that new industrial units established in the State would be exempted for a period of 5 years from payment of enhanced power tariff which had come into effect on 1.1.1992. This policy was reflected in the G.O. (MS) No. 4/92/ID dated 6.2.1992 which indicated that the concession would be available:

"i. to the units from the date of commercial production which start such production between 1.1.1992 and 31.12.1996.

ii. To manufacturing units only and not to service and entertainments units;

iii. To existing units for substantial expansion/modernisation/diversification. The concession in such cases will be available only for the consumption of the new machinery and equipment which add to th


































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top