SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1321

2004(7) Supreme 434
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Andhra Pradesh High Court)
P. Venkatarama Reddi & B.P. Singh, JJ.
Orsu Venkat Rao -Appellant
versus
State of Andhra Pradesh -Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1290 of 2003
Decided on 15-10-2004
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Radha Krishnan, Sr. Advocate, Mrs. S. Usha Reddy, Advocate.
For the Respondent : G. Venugopal and Ms. D. Bharati Reddy, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINT
When earlier version of two child eye witnesses to the murder of their mother by their father appeared to have been suppressed by prosecution, it would make entire prosecution case vulnerable and doubtful.

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860-Sections 302 and 201-Appellant convicted by Courts below for murder of wife-Conviction based mainly relying on evidence of two child witnesses, sons of appellant, PWs 2 and 16 aged six years and ten years-Appellant had returned home at 9 PM on date of incident after consuming toddy and abused deceased-When victim protested, appellant put a rope around her neck and placed rope on beam which was 9 feet high from floor level and hanged her till death-Two child witnesses were in room and when they raised hue and cry, PW 3 and 4 living in adjacent portion arrived got room opened and found body of deceased hanging-Death was opined on account of asphyxia due to hanging but doctor deposed that whether ligature marks were attributable to suicide or homicide was not possible-Question whether it was safe to act on evidence of two child witnesses -Evidence and circumstances showed that prosecution suppressed the earlier version of two child witnesses-Account of incident given by these witnesses also revealed that it was against natural course of conduct and probabilities-Evidence of these witnesses could not be said inspiring confidence-Earlier version of other witnesses who had arrived on spot on hearing hue and cry of children seemed to have been suppressed-Conviction could not be sustained. (Paras 5 to 11)

       

JUDGMENT

P. Venkatarama Reddi, J.-The accused was charged under Section 302 IPC for the alleged murder of his wife by name Chilakamma on 4th March, 1993 at about 9.00 p.m. at their house by strangulating with a rope and hanging her to the beam. He was also charged under Section 201 IPC for causing disappearance of evidence by shifting the dead body to his native place in a different village. On trial by the Sessions Judge, Khammam he was convicted under Sections 302 and 201 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. On appeal, the High Court confirmed the conviction and sentence and dismissed the appeal. The High Court as well as the Sessions Court, mainly relied on the evidence of two child witnesses-PWs 2 & 16 who were aged six years and ten years respectively on the date of the incident. At the time they gave evidence in the Court, they were of the age of 13 years and 17 years respectively.

2. The accused, who belonged to Wyra village in Khammam District of Andhra Pradesh, moved to Garla village with his family for eking out his livelihood by digging the wells. They were living on rent in a portion of the house belonging to PW4 s husband who was a teacher. It is the case of the prosecution that the accused used to consume liquor and beat up his wife now and then suspecting her fidelity. On the crucial day i.e. 4th March, 1993, it is alleged that the accused returned home by about 9.00 p.m. after consuming toddy and abused the deceased casting aspersions on her character. When she protested, he dragged her to the middle room of the house where the two children (PWs 2 & 16) were lying on the bed and tied a rope around her neck and placed the rope on the beam about 9 feet above the floor level and hanged her till death. As the children started crying, he commanded them to keep quiet showing a sickle against them. Thereafter, he bolted the door from outside and remained in another room. After sometime, the children raised hue and cry to alert the neighbour. It is alleged that PWs 3 & 4 living in the adjacent portion, after hearing the cries of PWs 2 & 16 that their mother was hanged to death, rushed to the other portion of the house. The accused opened the door and when they went inside they found that Chilakamma was hanging to the beam with a rope tied to her neck. Thereafter, the accused cut the rope and brought the body of Chilakamma outside and she was carried to the Government hospital at Garla by the accused and others. The two sons also accompanied. The Doctor at the hospital declared that she was dead. The accused took the dead body in a jeep to Wyra where the parents of the accused were residing. The accused gave impression to others that she died (committed suicide) on account of fits. The accused sent a message through PW8 to the parents of the deceased in the morning hours of 5.3.1993 that the deceased was hospitalized. PW1-the brother of the deceased Chilakamma, with his parents and others went to Wyra. Having seen the dead body and the injuries thereon, the father of PW1 lodged a report in the police station at Wyra at about 3.00 p.m. on 5.3.1993 in which he stated that he was suspecting his son-in-law-the accused for causing the death of his daughter. The FIR was prepared and the crime was registered by PW21 (Head Constable) who went to the spot and held the inquest over the dead body between 3.30 and 5.30 p.m. In the inquest report, it was noted that the ligature marks were found around the throat of the deceased. During the inquest, PW 21 examined the father of the deceased-the informant, his wife and PW1. He sent the dead body to the Government hospital at Madira for postmortem. As the place of occurrence was within the limits of Garla police station, he transferred the case file to Garla police station with a covering letter (Ext.P17) which according to PW19 was received at about 8.00 p.m. on 5.3.1993. Thereafter, PW19-the Sub-Inspector of Garla police station, re-registered the case and took up the investiga














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top