SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1369

D.M.DHARMADHIKARI, P.P.NAOLEKAR
U. P. State Sugar Corporation – Appellant
Versus
Mahalchand M. Kothari – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Dharmadhikari, J.-By Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Ordinance, 1971 which later became an Act No. 23 of the same name [hereinafter referred to shortly as the Ordinance/Act ], M/s Maheshwari Khetan Sugar Mill Pvt. Ltd., [Respondent No. 2 herein] at Ramkola, District Deoria in the State of Uttar Pradesh, was acquired by the appellant U.P. State Sugar Corporation [shortly referred to as the Corporation ].

2. On the date of coming into force of the Ordinance, the Sugar Mill was under management of Receiver appointed on 4.3.1970 by the Collector for recovery of dues of cane-growers as arrears of land revenue in accordance with section 279(1)(g) read with Section 286A of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 [shortly referred to as the Act of 1950 ].

3. M/s Mahalchand M. Kothari which is a partnership firm carrying on trade in Guwahati in the State of Assam filed two suits in the Court of Assistant District Judge, Guwahati for recovery of damages caused to it as a result of non-supply of sugar under the contract entered into by the plaintiff firm with the Receiver who was managing the Sugar Mill. The orders were placed by the plaintiff for suppl






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top