S.H.KAPADIA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Huda – Appellant
Versus
Babeswar Kanhar – Respondent
ORDER
Arijit Pasayat, J.-Leave granted.
2. The controversy in this appeal lies within a very narrow compass. The respondent No. 1 applied for allotment of a plot in response to an advertisement issued by the Haryana Urban Development Authority (in short HUDA ). The application was for allotment of a residential plot measuring 250 square yards, and deposit of Rs. 46,625/- was made on 26.12.2000. The HUDA intimated respondent No. 1 by letter dated 30.10.2001 that plot No. 2205 in Sector 65, Faridabad has been allotted to him. The respondent No. 1 purportedly, on the basis of Clause-4 of the letter, sent a registered letter on 28.11.2001, intimating HUDA that he is not interested in accepting the allotment. The letter was received on 3.12.2001 by HUDA. Referring to Clause-4 of the letter, HUDA directed forfeiture of the earnest money deposited. A complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short the Act ) was lodged by respondent No. 1 before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Faridabad (in short the District Forum ). By order dated 31.3.2003, the District Forum directed refund of the amount deposited along with 12% interest with effect from the d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.