ARIJIT PASAYAT, C.K.THAKKER
K. Hashim – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arijit Pasayat, J.-Strange though it may appear increasingly our country is becoming notorious for spiraling number of cases involving counterfeiting of currency notes, both of our country and foreign countries and stamp papers. It is becoming increasingly difficult for a lay man to be sure whether what he is receiving as a currency note is genuine or a counterfeited one. Similar is the position regarding stamp papers.
2. In these appeals the basic allegations against accused-appellants were counterfeiting of US currency of 20 dollars denominations. Originally, there were 7 accused persons. The accused persons are described as A-1, A-2 and so on in terms of their position during trial. One Rajan Chettiar died during trial. Two of the accused persons turned approvers. Out of the rest four, 2 are the appellants in these appeals and they are A-2 and A-3. All the four accused filed appeals before the High Court. They were each sentenced to RI for 7 years with a fine of Rs. 5,000/- with default stipulation of two years RI. They were separately convicted under Section 489C. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently. But the custodial sentence imposed was different. For
M.O. Shamsudhin v. State of Kerala
Suresh Chandra Bahri v. State of Bihar
G.S. Bakshi v. State (Delhi Administration)
Jnanendra Nath Ghose v. State of West Bengal
Bhiva Doulu Patil v. State of Maharashtra
Rameshwar v. State of Rajasthan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.