SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1595

S.B.SINHA, N.S.HEGDE, B.P.SINGH
Chief Engineer, M. S. E. B. – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Raghunath Bhokare – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Santosh Hegde, J.-Being aggrieved by the order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay made in W.P.No. 5836 of 2001 confirming the order of the Industrial Court, Pune made in Revision Application No. 12 of 2001 the appellant-Chief Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Board and another are in appeal before us. The facts necessary for disposal of this appeal are as follows :

2. The respondent herein and some others on being recommended by the District Social Welfare Department were selected as line-helpers in the appellant Board. On coming to know that the said recommendation was allegedly made fraudulently the respondent was dismissed from service by a letter dated 26.9.2000. Being aggrieved by the said order of dismissal the respondent herein filed a complaint alleging unfair labour practices under Items 1(a), (b), (d), (f) and (g) of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act before the I Labour Court, Pune, in Comp. ULP No. 145/99. The Labour Court framed the following 3 issues :

"(i) Does the respondent prove that the misconduct alleged against the complainant is proved on the basis of evidence before the Court ?

(ii) Whether the complainant








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top