S.B.SINHA, N.S.HEGDE, B.P.SINGH
Chief Engineer, M. S. E. B. – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Raghunath Bhokare – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Santosh Hegde, J.-Being aggrieved by the order of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay made in W.P.No. 5836 of 2001 confirming the order of the Industrial Court, Pune made in Revision Application No. 12 of 2001 the appellant-Chief Engineer, Maharashtra State Electricity Board and another are in appeal before us. The facts necessary for disposal of this appeal are as follows :
2. The respondent herein and some others on being recommended by the District Social Welfare Department were selected as line-helpers in the appellant Board. On coming to know that the said recommendation was allegedly made fraudulently the respondent was dismissed from service by a letter dated 26.9.2000. Being aggrieved by the said order of dismissal the respondent herein filed a complaint alleging unfair labour practices under Items 1(a), (b), (d), (f) and (g) of Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act before the I Labour Court, Pune, in Comp. ULP No. 145/99. The Labour Court framed the following 3 issues :
"(i) Does the respondent prove that the misconduct alleged against the complainant is proved on the basis of evidence before the Court ?
(ii) Whether the complainant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.