SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(SC) 61

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From : Criminal Appeal No. 19 of 1954 and Criminal confirmation No. 3 of 1954, D/-5-4-1954- Madhya Bharat-Gwalior Bench)19th September 1956
BHAGWATI, IMAM, GOVINDA MENON, JJ.
Mangal Singh and others, Appellants
Versus
State of Madhya Bharat, Respondent.
Criminal Appeal No. 33 of 1956.
Advocates appeared
Mr. J.M. Anand and Mr. R. A. Govind, Advocates for Appellants; Mr. Porus A Mehta and Mr. R. H. Dhebar, Advocates, for respondent.

Advocates:
J.M.Anand, PORUS A.MEHTA, R.A.GOVIND, R.H.Dhebar

Headnote:Article 136-New plea.

       Held: Where the question of the misjoinder of charges was not urged in the High Court and was not taken in the petition for special leave it cannot be permitted at the stage of hearing of the appeal. - Section 367-Appreciation of evidence-Evidence Act (1872), Ss. 5 and 133-Interested witnesses.

       Held: "It was suggested that when the two eye witnesses to the occurrence were interested persons there should be corroboration of their evidence by independent witnesses. It seems to us that this is a proposition which cannot be of universal application." (per Imam J.) - Sections S.133-Interested witnesses;

       Held: The proposition that when the eye Witness to the occurrence, were interested persons there should be corroboration of their evidence by independent witnesses cannot be of universal application - Section 54-Evidence of bad character.

       Held: The evidence which disclosed certain unpleasant things about the accused in the past was examined by the Courts in order to ascertain the motive for the murder and not for the purpose of determining as to whether the accused were pessons of bad character likely to commit murder.

Judgement

IMAM J. - This is an appeal by special leave, against the decision of the Madhya Bharat High Court. The appellants were convicted under S.302, read with S.34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to transportation for life for the murder of Suratsingh and Shardulsingh. They were also convicted under S.324 read with S.34, Indian Penal Code and sentenced to three years rigorous imprisonment for having caused hurt to Suratsingh and Shardulsingh for causing injuries to them by shooting them with fire-arms. The sentences of imprisonment were directed to run concurrently. The Sessions Judge had sentenced Mangalsingh to death and the other appellants to transportation for life for the murder of the deceased, but the High Court reduced the sentence of Mangalsingh to transportation for life. The Sessions Judge had framed charges under Ss. 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code against the appellants and, having found them guilty of it, sentenced them to 10 years rigorous imprisonment. The High Court altered the conviction of the appellants under this charge to one under Ss. 324/34 and reduced the sentence to three years rigorous imprisonment. Four assessors assisted the sessions Judge at the trial and they were of the opinion that the appellants were guilty of the charges framed against them.

2. The murder of Suratsingh and Shardulsingh, who were brothers, is said to have taken place on the 7th of March, 1953 at 6 p.m. on the Bhilsa-Pachhar road. The deceased had two brothers Surjansingh, P. W. 15, and Santokhsingh P. W. 16. An incident had taken place on the 7th of March, 1953 at about 10 or 11 a.m. at Suratsingh s house at Hinnoda when the appellant Dalipsingh with Tarasingh came and invited Suratsingh and Shardulsingh for shikar. Suratsingh, however, was not willing to go. About 3 or 4 p.m. Suratsingh, Shardulsingh, Surjansingh and Santokhsingh went to bathe in a river near village, which had no much water. Suratsingh and Shardulsingh were inside the water but Surjansingh and Santokhsingh were sitting on the bank of the river. Shortly thereafter the appellants arrived from the other side of the river. They had with them fire-arms. They were also accompanied by Tarasingh, who had a revolver. He fired his revolver and hit Suratsingh on the left arm. The appellant Dalipsingh, who was armed with a rifle, fired his rifle at Shardulsingh and hit him on the leg. Surjansingh and Santokhsingh ran away but returned later to the place and bandaged the wounds of Suratsingh and Shardulsingh. A bullock- cart was fetched from Hinnoda. The Injured persons were put on this cart in order that they may be taken to Pachhar Police Station. The cart after having traversed the Kucha track came on the Bhilsa-Pachhar road. The appellant and Tarasingh came there. The appellant Mangalsingh ordered the others to kill the deceased and their brothers Surjansingh and Santokhsingh. He then fired at Shardulsingh hitting him in the chest. Surjansingh and Santokhsingh ran away. It was about 6 p.m. and getting dark. They heard sounds of more gun fire. They further saw the appellants driving away the cart. Santokhsingh and Surjansingh hid themselves in the jungle till about mid-night and when the moon had risen they went to Chak Mullakhedi where their uncle Dalipsingh P.W. 14, resided. In the morning they went to Hinnoda and informed Suratsingh s wife of the murder of Suratsingh and Shardulsingh. They were told that the bullocks of the bullock-cart had returned in the course of the night. Surjansingh, Santokhsingh, Dalipsingh and one Tejasingh then left for Pachhar Police Station in order that they may lodge a report at the police station; which was done at 9.30 a.m. In the first information it had been mentioned that the cart was not seen on the road at the place where Surjansingh and Santokhsingh had it last. At the place between mile No.4 and the mile No.5 of Bhilsa-Pachhar metalled road a kucha path branches off towards village Davkhedi. Bhogi Chowkidar, P. W. 1








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top