SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(SC) 214

P.B.GAJENDRAGADKAR, K.N.WANCHOO
Pure Drinks (Private), LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Kirat Slngh Maungatt – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Per Gajendragadkar, J.:-This appeal by special leave arises out of an industrial dispute between the appellant, the Pure Drinks (Private), Ltd., and Its employee Kirat Singh Maungatt (represented by the respondent union). The dispute was with regard to the order of discharge by which the services of the employee were terminated by the appellant. The tribunal which tried this dispute has held that the termination was unauthorized and illegal and it has accordingly directed the appellant to reinstate the employee within two weeks from the date when the award becomes enforceable. The tribunal has also passed consequential orders in respect of the said reinstatement. It is against this order that the appellant has come to this Court with special leave.

The material facts leading up to the dispute are very few and they can be conveniently stated at the outset very briefly. Kirat Singh, the employee, has been working with the appellant as a route salesman since October 1952. The appellant is a private limited company engaged in the manufacture and supply of aerated water. On 28 March 1958, the employee signed the cash memo books and recorded his signature in the log-book as usual.






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top