SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 7

M.HIDAYATULLAH, J.L.KAPUR, J.C.SHAH
K. A. Ramachar – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income-tax, Madras – Respondent


Advocates:
D.GUTPA, G.S.PATHAK, K.N.RAJAGOPAL SASTRI, NAUNIT LAL

Judgment

HIDAYATULLAH, J. : These are two appeals by the legal representatives of one A. R. Rangachari, who died during the pendency, in the High Court at Madras, of proceedings in a reference under S. 66(1) of the Income-tax Act made by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras Bench. The following question was referred to the High Court for its decision :

"Whether the inclusion in the assessee s total income of the profits settled by him on his wife and two daughters is justified in law?"

The High Court answered the question in the affirmative. The appeals have been filed with a certificate granted by the High Court.

2. Rangachari was one of five partners of a firm, Messrs. Chari and Ram, and held a six-anna share in the profits and loss of the partnership. On September 22, 1947, he executed three deeds of settlement, which are marked Exts. A, A-1 and A-2, in favour of his wife, a married adult daughter and a minor daughter. To each of them, he assigned a fourth share of the profits of the firm payable to him (but not the losses), for a period of 8 years, vesting the right in them to receive the said share of profits absolutely and exclusively and declaring the settlements to be irre


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top