B.P.SINHA, J.C.SHAH, K.N.WANCHOO
Ramesh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
Judgment
SARKAR, J. : The appellants had brought into India from the U. S. A. a large quantity of electrical instruments under a licence. The respondent the Collector of Customs, Calcutta started proceedings for confiscation of these goods under S. 167(8) of the Sea Customs Act, 1878. The appellants contend that the proceedings are entirely without jurisdiction as the Collector can confiscate only when there is an import in contravention of an order prohibiting or restricting it and in the present case the Collector was proceeding to confiscate on the ground that a condition of the licence under which the goods had been imported had been disobeyed. The appellants, therefore, ask for a writ of prohibition directing the Collector to stop the proceedings. The question is, has the Collector jurisdiction to adjudicate whether the goods are liable to be confiscated? The decision of that question, however, depends on certain statutory provisions and the facts of the case to which, therefore, I shall immediately turn.
2. Sub-section (1) of S. 3 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 provides that the Government may by order prohibit restrict or otherwise control the import of goods.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.