SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(SC) 370

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
20th November, 1961
B.P. SINHA, C.J.I., J.L. KAPUR, M. HIDAYATULLAH, J.C. SHAH AND J.R. MUDHOLKAR, JJ.
Civil Appeals Nos. 185 to 187 of 1961
M/s. Motipur Zamindary Co. (Private) Ltd. (in all the appeals), Appellants
Versus
State of Bihar (in all the appeals, Respondent.)
with
Petitions Nos. 163 to 165 of 1959
Advocates appeared
M/s. Motipur Zamindary Co. (Private) Ltd. and another (in all petitions), Petitioners v. Superintendent of Taxes, Muzaffarpur and another (in all petitions), Respondents.
Civil Appeals Nos. 185 to 187 of 1961 with Petns. Nos. 163 to 165 of 1959,
Advocates appeared
Mr. M. C. Setalvad, Attorney General for India and Mr. Veda Vyasa, Senior Advocate (Mr. Naunit Lal. Advocate, with them), for Appellant/petitioners; Mr. A. S. R. Chari, Sr. Advocate (M/s. D. P. Singh, M. K. Ramamurthi, R. K. Garg and S. C. Agarwala, Advocates of M/s. Ramamurthi and Co., With him), for Respondents (In all the Appeals and Petitions).

Advocates:
A.S.R.CHARI, D.P.Singh, M.C.SETALVAD, M.K.RAMAMURTHI, NAUNIT LAL, R.K.GARG, RAMAMURTHI, S.C.AGRAWAL, Veda Vyasa

Judgment

KAPUR, J. : The principal question raised in these appeals and petitions under Art. 32 of the Constitution is whether sugar-cane falls within the term "green vegetables" and is therefore exempt from Sales tax under the exemption given by the notification dated August 28, 1947, issued under S. 6 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act (Act 19 of 47), hereinafter called the Act. After hearing the arguments in these appeals and petitions we announced our decision dismissing them with costs and we now proceed to give our reasons for the same.

2. The three appeals by special leave are brought by the assessment and relate to assessment of Sales tax for three years, 1950 51, 1951-52 and 1952-53 for which the amount of Sales tax levied was Rs. 28,866, 23,383 and 23,298 respectively. Besides the three appeals the assessee company has filed three petitions under Art. 32 challenging the constitutionality of the assessments. In this judgment the appellant and the petitioner is a private limited company and it will be termed "appellant" and the State of Bihar which is respondent will be termed the "respondent".

3. The appellant took an objection to the assessment and filed appeals to the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and then a revision to the Board of Revenue and then at its instance the following question was referred by the Board of Revenue to the High Court for opinion:-

"Whether sugar-cane is a green vegetable within the meaning of item 6 of notification -No. 9884. FT dated 28-8-47 and as such exempt from taxation."

The High Court answered the question against the appellant and held that "sugarcane" was not included in the term "green vegetables" and it is the correctness of that answer which has been canvassed before us. In the petitions under Art. 32 of the Constitution it was contended that the appellant being a producer of sugar-cane was not a "dealer" within the meaning of the Act and therefore no tax was payable on sale of sugar-cane by it.

4. The exemption under the Act is provided under S. 6 of the Act which, at the relevant time, was as follows :-

S. 6 "No tax shall be payable under this Act on the sale of any foods or class of goods specified in this behalf by the (State) Government by notification in the Official Gazette, subject to such conditions as may be mentioned in the notification :

Provided no notification shall be issued under this section without giving in the Official Gazette such previous notice as: the State Government may consider reasonable; of its intention to issue "such notification."

Under S. 6 of the Act the notification relied upon was issued on August 28, 1947. This was notification No. 9884-FT which was in the following terms :

"In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 6 of the Bihar Sales Tax Act, 1947 (Bihar Act XIX of 1947), and in supersession of all the previous notifications on the subject, the Governor of Bihar is pleased to direct that no tax shall be payable under the said Act on the sale of goods specified in the second column of the schedule hereto annexed subject to the exceptions, if any, set out in the corresponding entry in the third column thereof.

THE SCHEDULE

Serial description No. of goods Exception subject to which the exemption has been allowed.

1. .....................................

2. .....................................

3. .....................................

4. .....................................

5. .....................................

6. Green vegetables other than potatoes Except when sold in sealed containers.

......................................

The question raised is that sugar-cane falls within the term "green vegetables" in entry 6 of the Schedule and is therefore exempt from assessment to Sales tax. In support of this contention counsel for the appellant relied upon a judgment of the Bombay High Court, State of Bombay v. R. S. Phadtare 1956-7 STC 495 where it was held that sugar-cane is "fresh vegetable" and is therefore exempt from Sales tax under a simil












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top