SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 362

SYED JAFAR IMAM, N.RAJAGOPALA AYYANGAR, K.SUBBA RAO, J.R.MUDHOLKAR
Haji T. J. Abdul Shakoor – Appellant
Versus
Bijai Kumar Kapur – Respondent


Judgment

AYYANGAR, J.: On March 27, 1954 the three Kapurs - who are the respondents before us - filed original Suit No. 29 of 1954 before the District Judge, Bangalore against the 3 appellants who are brothers, for the recovery of over Rs. 50,000/- and subsequent interest and costs due on a simple mortgage. Before the suit came on for trial the parties filed a memo of compromise dated September 30, 1955 and they prayed that the suit may be decreed in terms thereof. The Court accepted the application and passed a decree as prayed for the order reading:

"It is ordered and decreed that the plaintiff s suit be and the same is hereby decreed as per terms of the compromise, the copy of which is hereunto annexed."

The terms of the Razinama ran as follows:

"1. That the defendants herein agree to a decree being passed as prayed for.

2. That the mortgaged properties are hereby sold for the amount of the decree in full satisfaction thereof. The defendants will execute a regular sale within ten days from this date.

3. That the mortgaged properties are here by put in possession of the plaintiff (decree-holder) by the 3rd defendant (judgment-debtor) and judgment-debtor 1 and 2 agreeing to pay rent at














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top