A.N.RAY, I.D.DUA
Nanik Awatrai Chainani – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
DUA, J.-In this appeal by special leave the appellant who has appeared in person challenges the order of a learned single Judge of the Gujarat High Court (Shelat, J.), dismissing in limine criminal revision against the order of the Sessions Judge, dated October 4, 1969, dismissing the appellant s revision from the order of the Judicial Magistrate, Kalol, dated August 30, 1969, granting the application of the railway administration under Section 138 of the Indian Railways Act and directing the P. S. I. Railways at Sabarmati who is also the P. S. I. Railways at Kalol to secure possession of the stalls in question from the appellant to the railway administration or to the person appointed by the administration in that behalf.
2. The appellant had, on February 9, 1964, entered into an agreement with the railway administration by means of which he was allotted a Tea Table (hereafter described as Tea Stall) at Kalol railway station. This agreement came into force from May 18, 1964, and subject to the provisions for earlier termination was to remain in force for three years. By a similar agreement, dated February 20, 1955, the appellant was allotted a Refreshment Stall at the same
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.