SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 106

C.A.VAIDIALINGAM, J.M.SHELAT, V.BHARGAVA
Alloy Steel Project – Appellant
Versus
Workmen – Respondent


Advocates:
C.K.DAFTARY, D.N.MUKHERJI, MANUJA GUPTA, RAMAMURTHI, S.C.AGRAWAL, S.C.GUPTA, SANTOSH CHATTERJI

Judgment

Bhargava, J.-The appellant, Messrs. Alloy Steel Project, is an undertaking owned, controlled and managed by a Government Company, viz., Messrs. Hindustan Steel Ltd. Alloy Steel Project was started in the year 1961 and it went into production in the year 1964-65. No profit was earned at least right up to the year 1967-68. The workmen, however, claimed bonus at the minimum rate prescribed under the Payment of Bonus Act No. 21 of 1965 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") in respect of the year 1965-66 on the plea that this Alloy Steel Project was a part of the Hindustan Steel Ltd. and could not be treated as a new establishment for purposes of Section 16 of the Act. Hindustan Steel Ltd. was itself an establishment which had been in existence for a long period and had been even earning profits, so that exemption could not be granted to this Company in respect of payment of bonus under Section 16 of the Act, This claim of the workmen was resisted by the Company on the plea that Alloy Steel Project was a separate establishment in respect of which separate balance-sheets and profit and loss accounts were maintained, so that no bonus was payable until either this Project itself e




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top