SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(SC) 414

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.S.SARKARIA, V.R.KRISHNA IYER, D.G.PALEKAR, JJ
Katikara Chintamani Dora – Appellant
Versus
Guntreddi Annamanaidu – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents:

Table of Content
1. factual background of land dispute. (Para 1)

This appeal by certificate, involves an examination of the, limits, of the respective. jurisdictions of the Settlement Officer/Tribunal and the Civil Court in relation to an inquiry under s. 9(1) of the Madras Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1948 (for short, Abolition Act) and the effect of the Amending Acts .17 and 18 of 1957 and Act 20 of 1960 on cases regarding such an inquiry pending in or decided by the, Civil Courts. It arises out of the following facts :

During the pendency of the said appeal, the appellants instituted Original Suit No. 101 of 1954 (out of which the present appeal has arisen) in the Court of Subordinate Judge Srikakulam, against the respondents herein and others for the recovery of Rs. 15,681/19 as rent or damages for the year 1953 in respect of the lands cultivated by them in the area of village Kadakalla.

On January 22, 1958, the respondents herein made an application for permission to file an additional written statement for adding the plea that the suit village is an 'inam estate. On March 17, 1958, the trial court dismissed this application holding that the question %ough

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top