SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(SC) 327

S.MURTAZA FAZAL ALI, V.R.KRISHNA IYER, A.C.GUPTA
Amalgamated Electricity Company LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Jalgaon Borough Municipality – Respondent


Advocates:
Chaudhary, F.S.NARIMAN, I.M.SHROFF, K.RAJENDRA CHAUDHARY, K.S.Ramamurthy

Judgment

FAZL ALI, J. - This appeal by special leave against the judgment dated February 14, 1967, of the High Court of Bombay turns upon the interpretation of clause 3 of the agreement Ext. 39 executed between the parties containing the terms and on conditions on which the plaintiff/ appellant was to supply electricity to the defendant the Jalgaon Borough Municipality.

2. What appears to us to have been a short and simple case has been rendered cumbersome and complicated by somewhat complex and involved process of reasoning adopted by the High Court in interpreting the various clauses of the agreement Ext. 39. The plaintiff/appellant s case was based mainly on cl.3 of the agreement but the High Court instead of concentrating its attention on the interpretation of the scope and ambit of this particular clause appears to have entered upon a roving inquiry and a detailed determination of the history of the case, the various clauses of the agreement executed, the licence taken by the appellant, and so on, which, in our opinion, were not at all germane for the decision of the simple issue which arose in this appeal.

3. The facts of the case lie within a very narrow compass. The plaintiff/

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top