SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 27

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY, N.L.UNTWALIA
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
E. K. KURIYIPES – Respondent


Judgment

Untwalia, J.-Heard learned counsel for the parties. In our opinion, technically speaking the High Court had no jurisdiction to interfere with the Order of the trial Court directing the issuance of a Commission for doing certain things in a claim case. But having appreciated the other facts and circumstances of the case and specially the judgment of the High Court in O.P. No. 2003 of 1973 which judgment was given in the year 1976, and after having appreciated the observations of the High Court in the judgment under appeal we have come to the conclusion that the matter requires reconsideration at the hands of the trial court. We, therefore, allow the appeal, set aside the Order of the High Court as also of the trial court and send the matter back to the latter court for a reconsideration of the question as to whether a Commission should be issued in this case or not if so for what purpose. The trial court is directed to do so keeping in view the judgment aforesaid of the High Court. No order as to costs.

For Citation : 1981 Supp (SCC) 72

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top