SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(SC) 380

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.C. GUPTA AND E.S. VENKATARAMIAH, JJ.
Shaikh Noor Mohamad Shaikh Fazal, Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra.
Criminal Appeal No. 203 of 1975, D/- 28-8-1980.

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code,1860 - Sections 417, 420 read with 511 and 471 read with 467 - Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Section 6 and 4 - Offence of Cheating - Uisng as genuine a forged document - Charged - Appellant was convicted of offences under Sections 417, 420 read with Section 511 and Section 471 read with Section 467 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment and fine for those offences - Having heard counsel for both sides Court do not find any reason to disturb order of conviction in respect of offences under Sections 417 and 420 read with Section 511 but as regards offence under S. 471 read with Section 467, I.P.C. 298 - Held, Court do not think that two certificates appellant has been found to have forged to get admission in Arts and Commerce College affiliated to University could be described as "valuable security" as expression is defined in Section 30 of Indian Penal Code – Court set aside sentences passed against appellant and remit matter to trial court to consider, as provided in Section 6 of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, whether appellant should be given benefit of Section 4 of said Act - If trial Court does not find it expedient to release appellant on probation of good conduct under Section 4 of that Act, it should then pass proper sentences on appellant for offences of which appellant has been found guilty - Fine imposed on appellant, if paid, shall be refunded - Appeal is disposed of

Judgment

GUPTA, J.:- The appellant was convicted of offences under Sections 417, 420 read with Section 511 and Section 471 read with Section 467 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment and fine for those offences. Having heard counsel for both sides we do not find any reason to disturb the order of conviction in respect of offences under Sections 417 and 420 read with Section 511 but as regards the offence under S. 471 read with Section 467, I.P.C. 298 we do not think that the two certificates the appellant has been found to have forged to get admission in the Arts and Commerce College affiliated to Poona University could be described as "valuable security" as the expression is defined in Section 30 of the Indian Penal Code. We, therefore, alter the conviction under the aforesaid Sections to one under Section 471 read with Section 465 of the Indian Penal Code. However, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case we set aside the sentences passed against the appellant and remit the matter to the trial court to consider, as provided in Section 6 of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, whether the appellant should be given the benefit of Section 4 of the said Act. If the trial Court does not find it expedient to release the appellant on probation of good conduct under Section 4 of that Act, it should then pass proper sentences on the appellant for the offences of which the appellant has been found guilty. The fine imposed on the appellant, if paid, shall be refunded. The appeal is disposed of as above.

Order accordingly.

For Citation : AIR 1981 SC 297

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top